Incrementality. It’s a term that marketing professionals increasingly reference, but what does it truly mean? For many in the affiliate marketing space, incrementality is seen as a definitive measure of success—a way to prove the effectiveness of campaigns. Yet, achieving and leveraging incrementality is often hindered by misunderstandings and inconsistent measurement approaches. As a result, a channel with enormous potential remains underfunded, undervalued, and frequently overlooked by CMOs focused on short-term wins.
Understanding Incrementality: The Missing Link
Affiliate marketing has long been a performance-driven channel, delivering measurable conversions, actions, and sales. However, positioning it alongside traditional paid media channels has proven challenging. Media mix modeling (MMM) and incrementality measurement are frequently discussed as tools to bridge this gap, but execution varies significantly across the industry.
Too often, incrementality is framed as a theoretical exercise rather than a tangible outcome. Many measurement approaches claim to assess it, but the tools and methodologies used are often inconsistent, leading to a disconnect between expectation and reality. CMOs seek proof that affiliate marketing delivers incremental value, but without accessible and reliable measurement solutions, justifying increased investment in the channel remains difficult.
The irony is that affiliate marketing is inherently well-positioned to deliver incrementality. Unlike other channels, it can precisely measure performance across the customer journey. However, the industry has yet to articulate this value in a way that resonates with decision-makers. If affiliate marketing is to gain recognition as a critical component of a brand’s media mix, the misconceptions surrounding incrementality must be addressed head-on.
Overcoming Measurement Challenges
The industry’s struggle with incrementality measurement is not due to a lack of interest but rather a lack of standardized, validated approaches. Several key challenges need to be addressed:
1. Separating Correlation from Causation
A significant flaw in many current incrementality models is the failure to distinguish whether conversions were genuinely influenced by affiliate efforts or would have occurred organically. Incrementality measurement, by definition, requires establishing causation—not merely identifying correlation. Without controlled testing, brands risk misattributing success and making flawed budget decisions.
2. Difficulties in Isolating the Channel’s Incrementality
Unlike paid search or display ads, which can be turned off for controlled testing, affiliate links remain active, making it challenging to isolate their direct impact. Pausing affiliate activity to measure true incremental contribution could suppress conversions, creating misleading conclusions about performance. Designing reliable holdout tests that account for these nuances is essential for credibility.
3. Alignment with Broader Marketing Strategies
Many organizations rely on established marketing mix modeling and multi-touch attribution frameworks that do not integrate seamlessly with affiliate measurement. Incrementality models that conflict with existing measurement infrastructure are unlikely to gain traction with CMOs and CFOs tasked with cross-channel budget allocation.
4. Risk of Business Disruptions
Misapplying incrementality insights could destabilize business performance. Reallocating budget based on untested or flawed incrementality claims may alienate high-performing partners or reduce customer reach. Incrementality strategies should be validated through independent testing before scaling to avoid unintended consequences.
The Role of Automation and Data in Unlocking Performance Toward Incrementality
One of the key barriers to progress is the manual nature of affiliate marketing measurement. While other advertising channels have embraced programmatic solutions and automation, affiliate marketing has been slower to adopt these advancements, often relying on subjective decision-making instead.
For instance, in a single article, a wellness blog might feature three activewear brands—Brand 1, Brand 2, and Brand 3. Historically, the partner would prioritize these brands based on fixed commission rates. However, this approach overlooks critical performance data. Brand 2 may offer a lower commission than Brand 1, but if data shows that Brand 3 consistently converts better with the blog’s audience, it should be prioritized. This is where automation and predictive analytics become crucial.
By leveraging historical performance data and programmatic tools, partners can make smarter decisions about which brands to promote. Similarly, brands can use these tools to identify high-performing partners that align with their goals. This shift toward automation has the potential to transform affiliate marketing into a truly data-driven channel, delivering measurable incrementality at scale.
Yet, automation alone is not enough. Without a rigorous, transparent measurement framework, data-driven decisions risk being misguided. Performance insights must be linked to validated causation rather than correlation. Otherwise, brands could end up optimizing for outcomes that would have occurred regardless of affiliate influence—a scenario that undermines true incrementality.
The Peril of Overstating Incrementality
There has always been skepticism among CMOs and finance teams regarding affiliate marketing’s claimed incrementality. Overstating affiliate contributions without robust evidence risks damaging the channel’s credibility. Too often, measurement frameworks for affiliate marketing are designed or promoted by industry stakeholders with a vested interest in affiliate success—raising concerns about objectivity. When recommendations lack independent validation or third-party scrutiny, they are unlikely to persuade decision-makers. Self-indulgent claims of “we proved it” or defining incrementality improperly (it’s not the same as lift), risk undermining our collective progress.
Incrementality claims that cannot be substantiated through rigorous testing—such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or geo-based holdout tests—are unlikely to drive meaningful investment. CMOs and CFOs are justified in demanding clear, unbiased proof that affiliate efforts are driving revenue beyond organic baseline activity. Affiliate marketing managers must be prepared for this scrutiny and ensure they can defend their measurement approaches with credible, evidence-based results. Pointing to industry marketing narratives and collateral in lieu of empirical validation can put both their strategies and professional credibility at risk.
A Collaborative Path Forward
The future of affiliate marketing lies in collaboration. Brands, technology providers, and measurement experts must work together to create standardized, transparent approaches for evaluating incrementality. This means:
- Developing tools that seamlessly integrate with existing marketing analytics frameworks to ensure affiliate marketing is measured fairly alongside other channels.
- Conducting independent, controlled tests—including holdout testing and geo-based experiments—to validate affiliate-driven revenue.
- Educating CMOs and finance teams on the nuances of incrementality and how it relates to, and differs from, MMM, ensuring they have the data and confidence to make informed investment decisions.
- Leveraging automation and AI-powered insights to drive smarter decision-making at both the brand and publisher partner levels.
The Bottom Line: Incrementality as a Growth Driver
Affiliate marketing is poised to be a significant driver of growth, but achieving its full potential requires a fundamental shift in how incrementality is understood and measured. It is not just a buzzword—it is a measurable outcome that can transform how brands allocate budgets and optimize performance.
However, this requires moving beyond surface-level claims and investing in measurement frameworks that hold up to empirical scrutiny. Controlled experiments, independent validation, and alignment with existing attribution models will be key to overcoming skepticism and securing increased investment.
As the marketing landscape evolves, the demand for accurate, reliable incrementality measurement will only grow. The industry must rise to the challenge by prioritizing data, automation, and collaboration. By doing so, we can ensure that affiliate marketing is not just seen as a complementary channel but as a cornerstone of the modern media mix.
Now is the time to rethink how we measure value. The path to better incrementality measurement starts with greater transparency, more rigorous methodologies, and a commitment to continuous innovation.
Learn more by vising us here.
